Copy number and sequence variation in rDNA of <i>Daphnia pulex</i> from natural populations: insights from whole-genome sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has a vital role in ribosome biogenesis as it contains the genes that encode ribosomal RNA (rRNA) separated by intergenic spacers (IGSs). The rRNA genes occur in hundreds to tens of thousands of copies per haploid genome in eukaryotes and are generally highly conserved with low variation within species. Due to the repetitive nature and large size of rDNA arrays, detecting intraindividual variation can be difficult. In this study, we use whole-genome sequences of 169 Daphnia pulex individuals from 10 natural populations to measure the copy number and sequence variation in rDNA. This revealed that variation in rDNA copy number between individuals spans an order of magnitude. We further observed a substantial level of sequence variation within individual genomes. As expected, single-nucleotide polymorphisms occurred in regions of lower functional constraint such as the IGS and expansion segments of the rRNA genes. The presence of strong linkage disequilibrium among variants facilitated identification of haplotypes within each population. Although there was evidence of recombination among haplotypes from different populations, it is insufficient to eliminate linkage disequilibrium within populations. Estimating copy number and haplotype diversity within individuals revealed that the level of intraindividual sequence variation is not strongly correlated with copy number. The observed patterns of variation highlight a complex evolutionary history of rDNA in D. pulex. Future research should explore the functional implications of rDNA copy number and sequence variation on organismal phenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".