MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Convolutional Neural Network Classifies Beat-to-Beat Arterial Pressure Spectrograms and Wavelet Transforms according to Age, Sex, and Metabolic State: Novel Frequencies for Cardiovascular Risk Appraisal

2024· article· en· W4398174627 on OpenAlexaff
Nour Mounira Bakkar, Abdalrhman Mostafa, Ahmed Eladl, Mohamed Abdelhack, Ahmed F. El‐Yazbi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsKrembil Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrogramConvolutional neural networkBeat (acoustics)Blood pressureWaveletSpeech recognitionCardiologyPattern recognition (psychology)Wavelet transformComputer scienceInternal medicineArtificial intelligenceMedicineAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemodynamic homeostasis is under the control of multiple systems. Continuous blood pressure (BP) time series carry information relevant to the pathophysiological status of the cardiovascular system. Beside average BP, different measures of variability provide prognostic value for distinguishing between cardiovascular risk states. The latter are derived from time- and frequency- domain analysis of BP recordings and are limited by their capacity to provide cumulative risk appraisal among different risk groups. The prediabetic state is associated with cardiovascular risk which is often described to be age- and sex-specific. In this study, we sought to determine distinctive features of continuous arterial pressure (AP) time-series for risk appraisal in a pre-established prediabetic rat model. To overcome the shortcomings associated with conventional BP variability parameters, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using spectrograms and scalograms generated from short-term Fourier- and Morlet wavelet- transforms of AP time series, respectively, from male and female prediabetic rats fed a mild hypercaloric diet for 12- or 24- weeks and their corresponding controls. The CNN consisted of 5 convolutional layers, separated by batch normalization, ReLU activation, and max pooling. The outcome of the fifth convolutional layer had 40% of the data dropped out and delivered to a fully-connected dense layer and then to a softmax function. The data was divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% test sets. The model classified spectrograms and scalograms with test accuracy of 90%+ for the different binary and multi-class classification tasks. On backward propagation of model scores, different salient frequencies were identified as critical features for classification of AP time-series. The identified frequencies were much higher than those typically used in conventional power spectral density (PSD) analysis. Using 3-way ANOVA or principal component analysis for comparison and clustering of the different cardiovascular risk groups of age, sex, and metabolic disease, respectively, according to PSD at the identified peaks does not yield suffcient risk appraisal. This indicates that the CNN possibly captures non-linear relations which are undetectable using inherently linear methods.The results indicate sex- and age-specific patterns of cardiovascular deterioration in prediabetes. Use of artificial intelligence models for the identification of abnormal BP fluctuation patterns can provide suffcient risk appraisal needed for early intervention, particularly in at-risk patients lacking clinical signs of overt cardiovascular disease. None. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207