MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interactions Between Reproductive Hormones and Neuro-Vascular Regulation During the Cold Pressor Test in Young Females

2024· article· en· W4398176282 on OpenAlexaff
Yasmine Coovadia, Laila A Chaudhry, Divine Malenda, Emily K Van Berkel, Charlotte W. Usselman

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHormoneCold pressor testPhysiologyBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, we reported that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is not predictive of vascular nor blood pressure outcomes during the cold pressor test (CPT) in young healthy females. Instead, we observed substantial variability in vascular responses to the CPT which ranged widely from decreases in blood flow and vascular conductance to increases in these same outcomes. Interindividual differences in circulating reproductive hormones may account for this female-specific variability in vascular responses to acute elevations in MSNA. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that reproductive hormones account for variability in MSNA, femoral blood flow (FBF), and femoral vascular conductance (FVC) during the CPT in females. We retrospectively assessed data from 9 young healthy females (age: 24±3 years) in the low hormone phase of their menstrual cycle (days 1-5). Intravenous blood samples were obtained and prospectively analyzed to assess concentrations of circulating reproductive hormones (radioimmunoassay). Integrated peroneal MSNA (microneurography; NeuroAmpEX, ADI) was quantified at rest and during a 3-minute hand CPT. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured beat-by-beat (Finometer Midi, FMS) and duplex vascular ultrasound was used to measure FBF; FVC was quantified as FBF/MAP (mL/min/mmHg). All variables are expressed as the difference between the average CPT value and the average baseline value. CPT-induced changes in MSNA burst incidence (bursts/100hb) were not related to [17-beta-estradiol] (R 2 =0.05; P=0.60), [progesterone] (R 2 =0.11, P=0.47), or [free testosterone] (R 2 =0.01, P=0.81). Similarly, changes in FBF and FVC were not related to [17-beta-estradiol] (FBF: R 2 =0.04, P=0.67; FVC: R 2 =0.01, P=0.80) or [progesterone] (FBF: R 2 =0.04, P=0.67; FVC: R 2 =0.09, P=0.51). However, there was a negative correlation between [free testosterone] and the changes in both FBF (R 2 =0.69, P=0.02) and FVC (R 2 =0.66, P=0.03). In other words, females with higher free testosterone demonstrated larger decreases in FBF and FVC during the CPT relative to those with lower free testosterone concentrations. These data suggest that circulating free testosterone may act to increase the vasoconstrictive consequences of MSNA in females, and may account for the previously observed variability in vascular responses to MSNA during acute stress. This project was funded by: NSERC and FRQ-S. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207