MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398176505 · doi:10.7202/1110991ar

Anne Hébert, romancière : Hébert, Anne. OEuvres complètes II. Romans (1958-1970) : Les chambres de bois, édition établie par Luc Bonenfant, suivi de Kamouraska, édition établie par Anne Ancrenat et Daniel Marcheix, Montréal, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. « Bibliothèque du Nouveau Monde », 2013, 488 p.

2015· article· fr· W4398176505 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Milica Marinković

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers Anne Hébert · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anne Hébert, romancière / Hébert, Anne. OEuvres complètes II. Romans (1958-1970) : Les chambres de bois, édition établie par Luc Bonenfant, suivi de Kamouraska, édition établie par Anne Ancrenat et Daniel Marcheix, Montréal, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. « Bibliothèque du Nouveau Monde », 2013, 488 p.. Un article de la revue Les Cahiers Anne Hébert (Sexualité(s) dans l’oeuvre d’Anne Hébert) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers Anne HébertSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207