Surgical Management of Canine Prostatic Neoplasia: - A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aneleven year old castratedmale Labrador retriever dog was brought to the hospital, with a history of recurrent urinary incontinence. Physical examination revealed no gross abnormalities. However, urinary catheter was not able to reach the bladder while trying for retrograde urinary catheterization. Rectal examination revealed, enlarged prostate. Abdominal radiography confirmed the case as prostate enlargement. Pre-operative blood collected for hemato-biochemical analysis and thoracic radiograph was taken to rule out metastasis. Total prostatectomy was performed under general anaesthesia and bladder neck was reconstructed with pelvic urethra. Histopathological analysis of the excised Prostate gland mass was, confirmed as the prostateneoplasia. Post-operativelyurinary bladder catheter was fixed,systemic antibiotic and supportive therapy along with surgical wound dressing was continued for seven days. Urinary Catheter was removed on fifth post-operative day. The sutures were removed on 7th post-operative day after the complete healing and the animal made an uneventful recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".