Enhancing voxel‐based dosimetry accuracy with an unsupervised deep learning approach for hybrid medical image registration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deformable registration is required to generate a time-integrated activity (TIA) map which is essential for voxel-based dosimetry. The conventional iterative registration algorithm using anatomical images (e.g., computed tomography (CT)) could result in registration errors in functional images (e.g., single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET)). Various deep learning-based registration tools have been proposed, but studies specifically focused on the registration of serial hybrid images were not found. PURPOSE: In this study, we introduce CoRX-NET, a novel unsupervised deep learning network designed for deformable registration of hybrid medical images. The CoRX-NET structure is based on the Swin-transformer (ST), allowing for the representation of complex spatial connections in images. Its self-attention mechanism aids in the effective exchange and integration of information across diverse image regions. To augment the amalgamation of SPECT and CT features, cross-stitch layers have been integrated into the network. METHODS: Lu DOTATATE SPECT/CT datasets were acquired at different medical centers. 22 sets from Seoul National University and 14 sets from Sunway Medical Centre are used for training/internal validation and external validation respectively. The CoRX-NET architecture builds upon the ST, enabling the modeling of intricate spatial relationships within images. To further enhance the fusion of SPECT and CT features, cross-stitch layers have been incorporated within the network. The network takes a pair of SPECT/CT images (e.g., fixed and moving images) and generates a deformed SPECT/CT image. The performance of the network was compared with Elastix and TransMorph using L1 loss and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) of CT, SSIM of normalized SPECT, and local normalized cross correlation (LNCC) of SPECT as metrics. The voxel-wise root mean square errors (RMSE) of TIA were compared among the different methods. RESULTS: The ablation study revealed that cross-stitch layers improved SPECT/CT registration performance. The cross-stitch layers notably enhance SSIM (internal validation: 0.9614 vs. 0.9653, external validation: 0.9159 vs. 0.9189) and LNCC of normalized SPECT images (internal validation: 0.7512 vs. 0.7670, external validation: 0.8027 vs. 0.8027). CoRX-NET with the cross-stitch layer achieved superior performance metrics compared to Elastix and TransMorph, except for CT SSIM in the external dataset. When qualitatively analyzed for both internal and external validation cases, CoRX-NET consistently demonstrated superior SPECT registration results. In addition, CoRX-NET accomplished SPECT/CT image registration in less than 6 s, whereas Elastix required approximately 50 s using the same PC's CPU. When employing CoRX-NET, it was observed that the voxel-wise RMSE values for TIA were approximately 27% lower for the kidney and 33% lower for the tumor, compared to when Elastix was used. CONCLUSION: This study represents a major advancement in achieving precise SPECT/CT registration using an unsupervised deep learning network. It outperforms conventional methods like Elastix and TransMorph, reducing uncertainties in TIA maps for more accurate dose assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".