MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398187580 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3403877

Accelerated Feature Extraction and Refinement for Improved Aerial Scene Categorization

2024· article· en· W4398187580 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohan Tu, Laurence T. Yang, Siping Liu, Renfa Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFeature extractionCategorizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingExtraction (chemistry)Computer visionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning has displayed superior performance in aerial scene (AS) categorization. However, existing methods for AS classification tend to lack adaptability and efficiency, particularly in optimizing its performance on different embedded devices. They also often fail to dynamically adjust to varying scales of feature representations, which can limit their effectiveness across different datasets and devices. To solve these issues, we provide two algorithms. The first algorithm explores local key features by mining the interactivity between channels. The range of cross-channel interactions is dynamically determined through an adaptive strategy. This ensures that convolution operations are optimized. The resulting features are improved by the second proposed algorithm. The second algorithm introduces convolutions, attention, and functions to calculate the weight of features. It enhances feature discriminative power by assigning adaptive weights. Then, we introduce an inference acceleration method for AS categorization. We create efficient codes for the proposed algorithms through automated optimization to match different devices. The inference time of the proposed method is reduced on various devices. Experiments on three frequently used datasets show we attain higher accuracy. The accuracy of some categories reaches 100%. In contrast to similar methods, our accelerated algorithm has at least 43.16%, 53.37%, 10.07%, 31.16%, and 8.08% less inference time on RTX 2,080Ti, Titan V, Jetson TX2, Jetson NX, and Jetson Nano GPUs, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207