MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398187683 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3400849

Joint Secure Transceiver Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication

2024· article· en· W4398187683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransceiverJoint (building)Computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsWirelessComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the joint secure transceiver design for the full-duplex integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system, in which the base station performs the target tracking and communicates with the downlink and the uplink users by reusing the resources. Here, the target, referred to as Eve, is a potential eavesdropper with the intention of intercepting both the downlink and the uplink information. The security problem of the full-duplex ISAC system has not been studied well, where the sensing and communication signals suffer from the serious interference. In this paper, we jointly design the information beamformer, the radar waveform, the uplink communication receive filter, and the radar receive filter to achieve the downlink and uplink communication security and the target tracking. Specifically, both the Eve’s signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio minimization and the secrecy rate maximization problems, subject to the sensing and the communication constraints, are formulated for the ISAC system from the perspectives of the quality of service and the secrecy rate. An iterative algorithm is proposed for solving the formulated problems. We prove that, under appropriate conditions, the proposed iterative algorithm converges to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimal point of the original problem without the rank 1 constraint. We further extend the joint design to the case of the imperfect wiretap channel and the angle uncertainty. Numerical results show that our scheme remarkably outperforms the benchmark approaches. The performance is close to that of designing the secure communication and the sensing separately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it