MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398191044 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103078

Protocol for preclinical evaluation of locoregionally delivered CAR T cells in patient-derived xenograft models of brain tumors

2024· article· en· W4398191044 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Benjamin Draper, Chantelle Bowers, Eleni Vassalou, Ailsa Greppi, John Anderson, Nabil Ahmed, Michael D. Taylor, Laura Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthMedical Research CouncilStand Up To CancerChina Agricultural Research SystemGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityFondation Brain CanadaBritish Microcirculation SocietySt. Baldrick's FoundationKids Brain Health NetworkChildren Neurodevelopmental Disorders Network
KeywordsProtocol (science)MedicineCancer researchPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, we present a protocol for preclinical evaluation of locoregionally delivered CAR T cells in patient-derived xenograft models of primary, metastatic, and recurrent brain tumors. We provide instructions for isolating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), producing CAR T cells in conjunction with locoregional delivery, and preclinical trial design and analysis involving CAR T cells. Additionally, we describe comprehensive preclinical readouts and guidelines for critical endpoint sample collections. In line with clinical trial procedures, our protocol broadens available treatment modalities for direct clinical translation. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Donovan et al.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207