Cet autre qui me regarde. Phénoménologie de la mémoire et temps eschatologique dans Le Premier Jardin et Oh les beaux jours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors que Les fous de Bassan s’attachait à mettre en scène une Amérique métonymique tournée vers sa fin, tout se passe comme si Le Premier Jardin visait pour sa part à lester cette Amérique incertaine et eschatologique par l’anamnèse de son commencement, qui, chez Anne Hébert, prend le plus souvent la forme d’un re-commencement. Il s’agira ici d’interroger le dispositif temporel mis en fiction dans le roman, notamment par l’entremise d’une lecture de la pièce Oh les beaux jours et de sa temporalité figée d’après-coup. À travers cette analyse de la temporalité, on voudra également mettre en relief l’instrumentalisation de l’histoire collective par le sujet, qui cherche ainsi à se prémunir de sa propre mémoire, constamment mise à distance au sein du roman.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".