MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398194239 · doi:10.1088/2515-7655/ad4f15

Catalyst integration within the air electrode in secondary Zn-air batteries

2024· article· en· W4398194239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBattery (electricity)CatalysisElectrodeMaterials scienceDurabilityCoatingEnergy storageElectrochemistryNanotechnologyChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The air electrode of a Zn-air battery facilitates the O 2 reduction and evolution reactions during battery discharge and charge, respectively. These reactions are kinetically sluggish and appropriate catalysts are essential at the air electrode to increase battery efficiency. Precious metals are traditionally used, but increasingly attention has shifted towards non-precious metal catalysts to decrease the cost and increase the practicality of Zn-air batteries. However, loading of the catalyst onto the air electrode is equally as important as catalyst selection. Several methods can be used to deposit catalysts, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Example methods include spray-coating, electrodeposition, and impregnation. These can be categorized as indirect, direct, and hybrid catalyst loading techniques, respectively. Direct and hybrid loading methods generally provide better depth of loading than indirect methods, which is an important consideration for the porous, air-breathing electrode of a Zn-air battery. Furthermore, direct methods are free from ancillary materials such as a binder, required by indirect and hybrid methods, which translates into better cycling stability. This review examines the various techniques for fabricating catalyst-enhanced air electrodes with an emphasis on their contributions to battery performance and durability. More durable Zn-air battery air electrodes directly translate to longer operational lifetimes for practical Zn-air batteries, which is an important consideration for the future implementation of electrochemical energy storage in energy systems and technologies. Generally, direct catalyst loading techniques, which integrate catalyst material directly onto the air electrode structure, provide superior cycling performance to indirect catalyst loading techniques, which distribute an ex-situ synthesized material onto the top layer of the air electrode. Hybrid catalyst loading techniques, which grow catalyst material directly onto nanostructured supports and then integrate them throughout the air electrode architecture, offer a compromise between direct and indirect methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it