DC electric field sensor in a grounded enclosure with height adjustable pin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deployment of dc electric field sensors in outdoor environments requires a fully sealed enclosure to shield them from environmental damage. This paper explores the behavior of an electric field sensor housed within a grounded enclosure featuring an electrically floating cover plate. A capacitance model was developed for this configuration, revealing that a conducting extension pin positioned between the cover plate to a position closely above the sensor can enhance the field strength experienced by the sensor. In the experiment, when the aperture of the enclosure measures 30 mm × 30 mm, the floating plate dimensions are 15 mm × 15 mm, and the pin diameter is 4.6 mm, with the pin positioned 1 mm above the sensor, the detected field strength is amplified by a factor of 8.9 compared to when the extension pin is absent. • This paper examines an electric field sensor within a grounded enclosure with a floating cover plate. • The capacitance model study shows enhanced sensor sensitivity inside the enclosure. • A 4cm×5cm×6cm metal enclosure was built, with experimental results matching the simulation. • The capacitance model is applicable to all MEMS electric field sensor enclosure designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it