MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398197705 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47972-4_14

Science, Spirituality and Virtue Ethics

2024· book-chapter· en· W4398197705 on OpenAlexaffabout
V. Kumar Murty

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityVirtueVirtue ethicsEnvironmental ethicsEngineering ethicsPhilosophyEpistemologySociologyEngineeringMedicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give a nuanced and holistic description of what science is, how it is practised and how it is expressed. We pay particular attention to the human being who is doing the science. In this way, we see science and spirituality, along with virtue ethics, of mutual relevance, keeping their identities intact. Written in the vein of World Philosophy, we try to steer clear of narrow viewpoints beyond philosophical reasoning. This paper, anticipated as a foundation for future studies, builds on my lectures at the University of Toronto on ‘Knowledge, Identity and Behaviour: An Introduction to Indian Philosophy’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.017
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.481
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.082 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophySame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207