Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Editor-in-Chief follows the standard practice in writing the Introduction, starting with a broad discussion of the book’s subject matter and highlighting the distinctive contributions it incorporates. The book does not restrict its readership exclusively to the world of philosophers. The circle of thinkers contributing articles to its making occasionally expands beyond the philosophy departments of academia, and crosses the limit even further to include critical thinking from outside of academia for potential benefit to professional philosophers. The book is inclusive not only in being an exercise in World Philosophy, but in involving people from outside of the fold of Philosophy in the task, without compromising with the rigours of philosophical thinking. The Introduction transitions to individual articles starting from PART I: WORLD PHILOSOPHY, and ending with EPILOGUE: INCORPORATING IDEAS FROM THE MAHABHARATA, introducing them to the reader. In the process the Editor provides commentary, at times extensive, pointing out the need that discussions of the articles might generate toward further academic work in the areas which could not be accommodated within the confines of this book. He elaborates, where necessary, on areas dealt with in the articles for the benefit of readers not familiar with Indian thoughts. While introducing the articles, he often relates one to the other, as the thoughts contained in an article follow on to those in another. The book indulges in the virtue of interracial amity while it responds to the call for celebration of the annual World Philosophy Day by UNESCO in November toward amelioration of some deep ills afflicting humanity through the practice of philosophical reasoning. The philosophical engagement in virtue ethics in this anthology emphasizes the concept of existential becoming Indian philosophy points to in the process of heeding the problems the world faces today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".