MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398201186 · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.006

Transforming Health Care With Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Medical Documentation

2024· review· en· W4398201186 on OpenAlexaff
Archana Reddy Bongurala, Dhaval Save, Ankit Virmani, Rahul Kashyap

Bibliographic record

VenueMayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationHealth careMedicineNursingMedical educationComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing burden of medical documentation, particularly with the widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), has contributed to physician burnout and decreased job satisfaction.1 The intricate structure of medical notes, combined with the time-consuming data entry process,2 and physicians’ often limited typing proficiency, has considerably impeded their ability to prioritize patient care.3 The recent rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care offers a promising solution to alleviate the burden of documentation and optimize clinical workflows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMayo Clinic Proceedings Digital HealthSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207