Immortalization and Characterization of GFAP-expressing Glial Cells from the Adult Mouse Hypothalamus, Cortex, and Brain Stem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The generation of astrocyte cell lines from the hypothalamus is key to study glial involvement in hypothalamic physiology, including energy homeostasis. As such, we immortalized astrocytes from the hypothalamus of an adult male CD-1 mouse using SV40 T-antigen to generate the mHypoA-Ast1 cell line. A comparative approach was taken with two other murine GFAP-expressing cell lines that were also generated in this study: a mixed glial cell line from the cortex (mCortA-G1) and an oligodendrocyte cell line from the brainstem (mBstA-Olig1), as well as an established microglial cell line (IMG). mHypoA-Ast1 cells express GFAP, alongside other astrocytic markers such as Aldh1l1, Aqp4, Glt1 and S100b, and express low levels of microglial, ependymal and oligodendrocyte markers. 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) elevated mRNA levels of Il6, Il1b, Tnfα and Cxcl5 in mHypoA-Ast1 cells after 4 h, while 50 μM palmitate increased Il6 and Chop mRNA, demonstrating the ability of these cells to respond to inflammatory and nutrient signals. Interestingly, co-culture of mHypoA-Ast1 cells with mHypoE-N46 hypothalamic neuronal cells prevented the palmitate-mediated increase in orexigenic neuropeptide Agrp mRNA in mHypoE-N46 cells, suggesting that this cell line can alter neuronal responses to nutrients. In conclusion, we report mHypoA-Ast1 cells representing a functional astrocyte cell line from the adult mouse brain that can be used to study the complex interactions of hypothalamic cells, as well as dysregulation that may occur in disease states, providing a key tool for neuroendocrine research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".