Incipient Subduction and Slip Partitioning at High Obliquity: The Haida Gwaii Plate Boundary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plate motion obliquity along the dominantly transform Queen Charlotte plate boundary (QCPB) peaks offshore Haida Gwaii. To investigate the effects of obliquity on plate boundary deformation, we analyze continuous seismic waveforms from temporary and permanent stations from 1998 to 2020 to generate a catalog of ∼50,000 earthquakes across Haida Gwaii. We use an automated technique based on auto‐regressive phase detection and onset estimation to obtain the initial seismic catalog, integrate existing catalogs, invert for 3D velocity structure using data from the best constrained period, and relocate the entire catalog using the new 3D velocity model. We investigate the seismically active sections of the transcurrent Queen Charlotte fault (QCF), noting that little seismicity locates directly along its bathymetrically defined trace. Instead, seismicity illuminates a complex system of segmented structures with variable geometries along strike. Other clusters highlight active shallow faults within the highly deformed Queen Charlotte terrace. Few aftershocks appear on the thrust plane of the 2012 Mw 7.8 Haida Gwaii earthquake except near its inferred intersection with the QCF at 15–20 km depths, suggesting elevated residual stress at the juncture of slip‐partitioning. Deep crustal seismicity (up to ∼20 km depths) beneath central Haida Gwaii aligned parallel to the strike of the thrust plane may represent landward underthrusting of the Pacific plate. Our results suggest possible coseismic strike‐slip rupture on the QCF during the 2012 earthquake and add support to the thesis that highly oblique transform boundaries are viable settings for subduction initiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".