MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398207416 · doi:10.7202/1111227ar

L’émergence de l’option diaspora au Cameroun : recours à un concept magique dans un contexte de crise

2023· article· fr· W4398207416 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Léger Félix Ntienjom Mbohou

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Gouvernance · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article qui examine l’émergence de l’option diaspora au Cameroun contribue à un nombre croissant d’analyses critiques sur les migrations et le développement, et en particulier sur les diasporas et leur potentiel pour le développement. En mobilisant notamment la notion de « concept magique » à titre principal, ce travail montre comment la littérature en administration publique permet d’enrichir et de compléter la critique de l’option diaspora. Cette analyse, qui s’appuie sur une enquête auprès d’une quinzaine de fonctionnaires, d’experts et de professionnels, postule que dans un contexte où les défis et contraintes à surmonter pour une valorisation effective des potentiels de la diaspora sont nombreux et non complètement pris en charge par les autorités publiques, l’option diaspora peut être perçue comme un concept magique ou un totem promu par l’État et les organisations internationales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue GouvernanceSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207