The Role of the Glymphatic System in Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The glymphatic system plays a crucial role in clearing metabolic waste from the central nervous system and is most active during sleep. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have a dysfunctional glymphatic system that correlates with disease severity. In addition, these patients have worse outcomes after surgery. The status of the glymphatic system during the perioperative period is unclear and can be examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This study assessed perioperative glymphatic system changes in OSA surgical patients and possible relationships with perioperative neurocognitive disorders. METHODS: DTI data from 13 OSA patients having laparoscopic abdominal surgery with general anesthesia were acquired and analyzed using a 3.0-T MRI scanner. Diffusivity maps in the x -axis (D xx ), y -axis (D yy ), z -axis (D zz ), x - y axis (D xy ), y - z axis (D yz ), and x - z axis (D xz ) were calculated. Diffusion values for the projection and association fibers were extracted, and DTI analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) was performed. The patients' cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool. Evaluations were carried out within 5 days before surgery and within the first 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The ALPS index decreased after surgery, and this correlated with a decrease in general cognition scores and specific memory domains, including visuospatial and delayed recall. CONCLUSIONS: The glymphatic system in OSA patients is worsened after surgery and this may contribute to an increased risk for long-term postoperative cognitive disorders. This study suggest that the glymphatic system might play a role in the pathophysiology of perioperative neurocognitive disorders and be a potential therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".