MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4398210918 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.8771

Case – Long-term remission after repeated courses of palliative radiotherapy in a patient with metastatic MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma

2024· article· en· W4398210918 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aruni Jayatilaka, Eric Winquist, Jacqueline Lebiadowski-Parish, Dwight E. Moulin, Matthew J. Cecchini, Sympascho Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal cell carcinomaChromosomal translocationRadiation therapyMedicineOncologyTerm (time)Internal medicinePalliative careBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AssoCIAtIon resIdents' roomCase -Long-term remission after repeated courses of palliative radiotherapy in a patient with metastatic MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma CASE REPORT A previously healthy woman in her fourth decade presented with left flank pain and gross hematuria in the late 1990s.Computed tomographic (Ct) imaging revealed a 7x7 cm renal mass involving the upper pole of the left kidney and a 3x8 cm paraaortic lymph node without other evidence of metastases.she underwent a left nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy.pathology reported clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (rCC), Fuhrman grade 3, and the final stage was pt3bn1m0 (stage III).two years later, her cancer relapsed with nodal masses in the posterior mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and pelvis (Figure 1).Interferon-α was initiated but was discontinued after three months due to disease progression.she received palliative radiotherapy 20 gy/5 fractions (F) directed towards the recurrent disease, which had filled the entire renal bed/left flank and extended to the lower thoracic and lumbar spine.she tolerated radiotherapy well and had excellent radiological response; however, within three months, there was further progression in the left flank, and she again received radiation 20 gy/5F.she received oral Ae941 for nearly one year in a clinical trial and then her tumor progressed with bilateral t12 paravertebral masses.As this required retreatment of a previously irradiated area, she received 20gy/13F to these areas as an oblique pair going through the left flank, spine, and contralateral right sided tumor.Again, she tolerated radiotherapy well and imaging demonstrated partial regression of the left paravertebral mass and stability of a large mediastinal mass.she received gd-0039 in a phase 2 trial, which was discontinued after two months due to disease progression.Her chronic cancer pain reached crisis levels, and a pain specialist was consulted and initiated methadone and dexamethasone.restaging abdominal Ct scan reported increase in a left retroperitoneal mass, a large left paraspinal mass measuring 8 x 6 cm at level of t12, and metastases to bone with tumor infiltration into t11, t12 vertebral body and ribs, and t11/t12 foramina, encasing the aorta and extending into posterior mediastinum and left psoas muscle.she received two courses of concurrent simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy: 30 gy/10F above the diaphragm and 20 gy/10F below the diaphragm.Her pain improved, and imaging showed regression of masses in both locations.eight months later, she presented with pain in the right shoulder and imaging identified a 2x1 cm lesion in the right paravertebral area near the posterior thoracic inlet.she was treated with 40 gy/16F to the right supraclavicular area (Figure 2A).two months afterwards, she started treatment on a phase 1 clinical trial with an agonist monoclonal antibody to the trAIl receptor 2 (tr2J).After receiving one dose, she developed signs and symptoms of spinal cord compression confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (mrI) at the t3-5 level.study therapy was discontinued, and she was treated with radiotherapy to a total dose of 21 gy/11F.symptoms resolved, and with the sponsor's permission, treatment with tr2J resumed and continued for 20 months.she developed symptoms of t12 radiculopathy, and mrI confirmed progression of disease with destruction of left side of t12 vertebral body, expansion of proximal left 12 th rib, and a new t12 paraspinal soft tissue deposit.drug therapy was stopped, and she received radiotherapy 30 gy/10F to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→