MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398218835 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1366240

The lesion core extent modulates the impact of early perfusion mismatch imaging on outcome variability after thrombectomy in stroke

2024· article· en· W4398218835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Marburg, Linda F. Rudolf, Christine Matthis, Alexander Neumann, Constantin Schareck, Hannes Schacht, Robert Schulz, Björn Machner, Peter Schramm, Georg Royl, Philipp Koch

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversität zu LübeckDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScalePerfusion scanningCardiologyStroke (engine)Cerebral blood flowInternal medicinePerfusionLesionSingle CenterRadiologySurgeryIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Despite profitable group effects on functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion (LVO), many patients with successful reperfusion show a non-favorable long-term outcome, highlighting the necessity to identify potential biomarkers predicting outcome variability. In this regard, the role of perfusion mismatch imaging for outcome variability in the early time window within 6 h after symptom onset is a matter of debate. We attempted to investigate under which conditions early perfusion mismatch imaging accounts for variability in functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy. Patients and methods: In a retrospective single-center study, we examined 190 consecutive patients with LVO who were admitted to the Medical Center Lübeck within 6 h after symptom onset, all of whom underwent MT. Perfusion mismatch was quantified by applying the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) on CT-measured cerebral blood flow (CBF-ASPECTS) and subtracting it from an ASPECTS application on cerebral blood volume (CBV-ASPECTS), i.e., ASPECTS mismatch. Using multivariate ordinal regression models, associations between ASPECTS mismatch and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 90 days were assessed. Furthermore, the interaction between ASPECTS mismatch and the core lesion volume was calculated to evaluate conditional associations. Results: -value < 0.001], did show a significant association with functional outcomes. Model comparisons revealed that, profoundly, in patients with large core lesion volumes (CBV-ASPECTS < 6 or NCCT-ASPECTS < 6), perfusion mismatch showed a negative correlation with the mRS. Discussion and conclusion: Perfusion mismatch imaging within the first 6 h of symptom onset provides valuable insights into the outcome variability of LVO stroke patients receiving thrombectomy but only in patients with large ischemic core lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207