Developing a Visual Novel about Landmines: A One Health Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Landmines pose a serious threat to humans, the environment, and non-human animals. They are a wicked problem, and no perfect solution exists due to how they can damage the environment, put human and non-human animal lives at risk, and how recurring war increases the number of landmines globally. Landmines impact communities across the world, and there are two major pathways for dealing with landmines: Demining and education. While the value of demining cannot be overstated, the action done here focuses on the education side, and bringing awareness of landmines to youth, who are one of the most vulnerable groups. We made a visual novel using Ren’Py software and published it on online platforms Steam and Itch.io to help it reach a global audience, though it was written with youth in mind. Our project aims to open public discourse around landmines and facilitate an appreciation for the effects they have beyond just their impact on humans, focusing on equality between the pillars of One Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it