Burmese American Youth Experiences with Theravada Buddhism in the San Francisco Bay Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract How do children and young people in the Burmese diaspora learn Buddhism? What strategies do teachers use? And how do the students themselves view their experiences? This chapter attempts to answer these questions through the cases of two young lay females who both had short-term but highly impactful experiences: one as a temporary nun, and the other as a repeat attendee at a Buddhist youth camp. These experiences are contextualized, in the first instance with descriptions of the monastic space and the Burmese-language classes that prompted the subject’s choice of monastery, and in the second, with the history of the camp and exploration of its monastic spaces. In both these cases, Buddhism was not always taught directly by monks; that is, while they physically recalled the Buddha and Buddhism in terms of aesthetics, comportment, and the practice of sīla or “morality,” they were not usually the ones teaching Buddhism in the strictest sense. Thus, this research demonstrates the importance of studying lived Buddhism and how the laity—and especially the female laity—serve as active agents in the maintenance of Burmese Buddhism, and of Burmese culture more generally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".