MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398226755 · doi:10.5081/jgps.19.1.66

Improving smartphone-based positioning accuracy with height constraint and application to pedestrian and vehicular positioning

2023· article· en· W4398226755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Positioning Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceTransport engineeringSimulationReal-time computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the release of Android version 7 in 2016, the smartphone users have had access to the raw global navigation satellite system (GNSS) measurements (i.e., pseudorange, carrier-phase, Doppler, and carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N0)) through the new application programming interface (API) called android location (API level 24). This capability opens opportunities to apply different positioning techniques, ranging from absolute to differential techniques, to the smartphone observations. Precise point positioning (PPP) is a powerful method for conducting accurate real-time positioning using a single receiver, and it can be applied to the smartphone observations as well. Most PPP smartphone positioning studies have so far focused on utilizing the GNSS only observations obtained from the smartphone's API. However, incorporating additional information as constraints, such as height information, can enhance accuracy and overall stability. Although the vertical positioning accuracy of GNSS is generally lower than the horizontal accuracy, utilizing recorded height from the smartphone GNSS chipset can still be beneficial. This incorporation increases the degree of freedom and strengthens the geometry between the receiver and satellites. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of the uncombined PPP (UPPP) model in the presence of height constraints. We utilize both pedestrian walking and vehicular datasets collected by a dual-frequency Xiaomi Mi8 device to evaluate the effect of adding height constraint to PPP model. The results demonstrate an average improvement of 22% and 26% on the root-mean-square (RMS) of horizontal error and the 50th percentile error, respectively, when employing the height constraints UPPP model. Additionally, the findings indicated a decrease in PPP convergence time, further supporting the positive impact of incorporating height constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it