MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398233299 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfae069.360

#626 C3 glomerulonephritis and thrombotic microangiopathy—a prospective observational study

2024· article· en· W4398233299 on OpenAlexaff
Mythri Shankar, Ranjitha Siddalingappa, Sreedhara C.G., Anantha Kishan, Karthik Tenannkore

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic microangiopathyObservational studyMicroangiopathyMedicineGlomerulonephritisInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyKidneyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Complement mediated TMA (cTMA) and complement component 3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) are two distinct complement mediated kidney diseases. cTMA is characterized by acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. C3GN results from uncontrolled activation of the alternative complement pathway leading to the deposition of C3 in the glomerulus. We sought to describe characteristic differences between these two conditions in a large cohort of patients from Bengaluru, India. Method All cases of cTMA and kidney biopsy proven C3GN from 2019-2022 at a tertiary care centre in India were included. Patients with C3GN had persistently low C3 for more than 12 weeks and no identifiable source of infection. All patients received protocolized medical therapy; patients with C3GN were treated with steroids and cyclophosphamide, while those with complement mediated TMA received plasmapheresis in addition to cyclophosphamide and steroids. Protocolised medical management (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition and diuretics) was provided in both the cases. Demographic, clinical and lab parameters were reported and compared. Results A total of 25 cTMA cases and 19 C3GN cases were included in the study. Both C3GN (52.7%) and cTMA (48%) were more common in males. Patients with C3GN typically presented in the third decade of life while cTMA cases presented in the fourth decade. Secondary hypertension was common in the cTMA group (92% vs 78.9%, compared to C3GN). 60% of patients with cTMA had either recent or current infection compared to 21.1% of C3GN patients (P = 0.04). The majority of cTMA cases had IFTA of <25% (84%) compared to C3GN (57.9%) although this was not statistically significant. Both C3GN and cTMA most commonly presented as rapidly progressive kidney failure and acute kidney injury. A total of 76% of patients in the cTMA group required kidney replacement therapy as compared to 47.4% in the C3GN group (P = 0.009). 44% of cTMA cases had anti factor H antibody positivity compared to 15.8% of C3GN patients (P = 0.02). Finally, 44% of cases in cTMA group had complete recovery compared to 47.4% in C3GN group at the end of 2.8 years of followup. Conclusion Although both conditions result from dysregulation of the alternative pathway, there are several important clinical characteristic differences between patients with cTMA and C3GN including presence or absence of secondary hypertension, concurrent infection, anti-factor H positivity and requirement of kidney replacement therapy. This information may be helpful to inform both diagnosis and prognosis for patients presenting with a complement mediated kidney disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207