Robust seismic data denoising via self-supervised deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Seismic data denoising is a critical component of seismic data processing, yet effectively removing erratic noise, characterized by its non-Gaussian distribution and high amplitude, remains a substantial challenge for conventional methods and deep-learning (DL) algorithms. Supervised learning frameworks typically outperform others, but they require pairs of noisy data sets alongside corresponding clean ground truth, which is impractical for real-world seismic data sets. In contrast, unsupervised learning (UL) methods, which do not rely on ground truth during training, often fall short in performance when compared with their supervised or traditional denoising counterparts. Moreover, current unsupervised DL methods fail to address the specific challenges posed by erratic seismic noise adequately. This paper introduces a novel zero-shot unsupervised DL framework designed specifically to mitigate random and erratic noise, with a particular emphasis on blended noise. Drawing inspiration from Noise2Noise (N2N) and data augmentation principles, we develop a robust self-supervised denoising network called robust Noiser2Noiser. Our approach eliminates the need for paired noisy and clean data sets as required by supervised methods or paired noisy data sets as in N2N. Instead, our framework relies solely on the original noisy seismic data set. Our methodology generates two independent recorrupted data sets from the original noisy data set, using one as the input and the other as the training target. Subsequently, we use a DL-based denoiser, denoising convolutional neural network, for training purposes. To address various types of random and erratic noise, the original noisy data set is recorrupted with the same noise type. Detailed explanations for generating training input and target data for blended data are provided. We apply our network to synthetic and real marine data examples, demonstrating significantly improved noise attenuation performance compared with traditional denoising methods and state-of-the-art UL Codes are available on https://github.com/Ji-seismic/N2N_deblending.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".