MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Research Progress of China E-commerce Analysis in Different Periods of Epidemic

2024· article· en· W4398240732 on OpenAlexaff
Shilin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Economics Management and Political Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPlan (archaeology)National economyDistribution (mathematics)Development planEconomic growthBusinessEconomyGeographyEconomicsEconomic systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes how e-commerce in China has developed in different periods of time, respectively, the stable development before the epidemic, like the three five-year plans, in China, the “five-year plan”, known as the Outline of the Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China, is an important part of China’s national economic programme and is a long-term plan. It is a long-term plan, mainly for planning major national construction projects, the distribution of productive forces and important proportional relationships in the national economy, and for setting goals and directions for economic development. and the emergence of new retail, the time of the epidemic, although faced with the epidemic affecting the economic difficulties, but e-commerce also has its own unique advantages. The opportunities for e-commerce development in the post epidemic era and the future direction of development. E-commerce is an important part of the future market economy, and with China’s well-developed transportation industry, online retailing will become one of the most important ways to consume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Economics Management and Political SciencesSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207