MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398243116 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnae106

Singular Vortex Pairs Follow Magnetic Geodesics

2024· article· en· W4398243116 on OpenAlexaff
Theodore D. Drivas, Daniil Glukhovskiy, Boris Khesin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodesicMathematicsVortexMathematical analysisPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider pairs of point vortices having circulations $\Gamma _{1}$ and $\Gamma _{2}$ and confined to a two-dimensional surface $S$. In the limit of zero initial separation $\varepsilon $, we prove that they follow a magnetic geodesic in unison, if properly renormalized. Specifically, the “singular vortex pair” moves as a single-charged particle on the surface with a charge of order $1/\varepsilon ^{2}$ in an magnetic field $B$ that is everywhere normal to the surface and of strength $|B|=\Gamma _{1} +\Gamma _{2}$. In the case $\Gamma _{1}=-\Gamma _{2}$, this gives another proof of Kimura’s conjecture [11] that singular dipoles follow geodesics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207