MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398246792 · doi:10.1021/acsestair.3c00108

Primary Radical Effectiveness: Do the Different Chemical Reactivities of Hydroxyl and Chlorine Radicals Matter for Tropospheric Oxidation?

2024· article· en· W4398246792 on OpenAlexaff
P. M. Edwards, Cora J. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Air · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsRadicalChemistryPrimary (astronomy)PhotochemistryHydroxyl radicalChlorineOzoneReactivity (psychology)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The atmospheric oxidation of organics occurs primarily via reaction cycles involving gas phase radical species, catalysed by nitric oxide (NO), which result in the production of secondary pollutants such as ozone. For these oxidation cycles to occur, they must be initialized by a primary radical, i.e., a radical formed from non-radical precursors. Once formed, these primary radicals can result in the oxidation of organic compounds to produce peroxy radicals that, providing sufficient NO is present, can re-generate "secondary" radicals which can go on to oxidize further organics. Thus, one primary radical can result in the catalytic oxidation of multiple organics. Although the photolysis of ozone in the presence of water vapor to form two hydroxyl (OH) radicals is accepted as the dominant tropospheric primary radical source, multiple other primary radical sources exist and can dominate in certain environments. The chemical reactivity of different radicals to organic and inorganic compounds can be very different, however, and how these differences in radical chemistry impact atmospheric organic oxidation under different atmospheric conditions has not been previously demonstrated. In this work, we use a series of model simulations to investigate the impact of the chemical reactivity of the primary radical on the effectiveness in initializing organic oxidation and thus the production of the secondary pollutant ozone. We compare the chemistries of the OH and atomic chlorine (Cl) radicals and their effectiveness at initializing organic oxidation under different nitrogen oxide and organic concentrations. The OH radical is the dominant tropospheric radical, with both primary and secondary sources. In contrast, Cl has primary sources that show significant spatial heterogeneity throughout the troposphere but is not typically regenerated in catalytic cycles. Both primary OH and Cl can initiate organic oxidation, but this work shows that the relative effectiveness with which they oxidize organics and produce ozone depends on their balance of propagation vs termination reactions which is in turn determined by the chemical environment in which they are produced. In particular, our work shows that in high NOx radical-limited environments, like those found in many urban areas, Cl will be more efficient at oxidizing organics than OH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS ES&T AirSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207