Direct tumoral puncture embolization of onyx before endoscopic endonasal resection of a massive juvenile angiofibroma for a patient with Von Willebrand disease - A case report and review of literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Standard treatment of a juvenile angiofibroma (JNA) is surgical resection, usually with an endoscopic endonasal surgery and a preoperative embolization. However, standard intra-arterial embolization may fail to completely devascularize tumors. A novel technique of direct intranasal intratumoral onyx embolization has been described. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and the usefulness of this embolization technique on a pediatric case of JNA and to compare our results to previously reported cases. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A twelve-year-old patient suffering from Von Willebrand disease presented with a voluminous JNA with intracranial extension. Internal carotid artery (ICA) branches partially vascularized the tumor. The patient had two previous incomplete surgical resections, which were preceded by a standard embolization, due to massive perioperative bleeding. DISCUSSION: A direct intratumoral embolization of onyx safely allowed complete tumoral devascularization. Tumoral resection was then completed by an endonasal endoscopic approach. Surgery time was decreased (4,5 h versus 5,5 and 6,5 h) and blood loss were minimized (300 ml versus 1 l and 1,3 l). No complication occurred. Twelve articles previously reported this embolization technique. We present the first reported case of onyx embolization being used for a pediatric patient with a coagulation disorder and a voluminous tumor. CONCLUSION: A direct intratumoral onyx embolization allowed complete resection of a massive JNA, for a patient with Von Willebrand disease. Our data suggest that this technique is safe and may be instrumental for a JNA's resection, even if little vascularization comes from ICA branches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".