El pleito por el patronazgo del Hospital San Sebastián. La respuesta del procurador de Cartagena de Indias (1577)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1573, la Corona española presentó a fray Dionisio de Sanctis para ocupar la sede episcopal cartagenera. Muy temprano, el prelado constató que no era él quien tenía el patronazgo del Hospital San Sebastián, sino el cabildo secular. Fue así como entabló un pleito en contra de la institución municipal para recuperar el gobierno del centro hospitalario. Utilizando el expediente del proceso, se presenta los pormenores del pleito y se analiza el discurso de la respuesta dada por el procurador general de la ciudad a la demanda del prelado. Con ello se busca dar cuenta del papel que jugaron los obispos en la fundación y gobierno de los hospitales coloniales y de algunos aspectos del funcionamiento de la justicia local. Se adopta como hipótesis que, con el recurso interpuesto, el mitrado buscaba que se le devolviera el patronazgo del hospital, tal y como lo habían ostentado sus antecesores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".