Pathobiological signatures of dysbiotic lung injury in pediatric patients undergoing stem cell transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) uses cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation followed by intravenous infusion of stem cells to cure malignancies, bone marrow failure and inborn errors of immunity, hemoglobin and metabolism. Lung injury is a known complication of the process, due in part to disruption in the pulmonary microenvironment by insults such as infection, alloreactive inflammation and cellular toxicity. How microorganisms, immunity and the respiratory epithelium interact to contribute to lung injury is uncertain, limiting the development of prevention and treatment strategies. Here we used 278 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples to study the lung microenvironment in 229 pediatric patients who have undergone HCT treated at 32 children's hospitals between 2014 and 2022. By leveraging paired microbiome and human gene expression data, we identified high-risk BAL compositions associated with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.007). Disadvantageous profiles included bacterial overgrowth with neutrophilic inflammation, microbiome contraction with epithelial fibroproliferation and profound commensal depletion with viral and staphylococcal enrichment, lymphocytic activation and cellular injury, and were replicated in an independent cohort from the Netherlands (P = 0.022). In addition, a broad array of previously occult pathogens was identified, as well as a strong link between antibiotic exposure, commensal bacterial depletion and enrichment of viruses and fungi. Together these lung-immune system-microorganism interactions clarify the important drivers of fatal lung injury in pediatric patients who have undergone HCT. Further investigation is needed to determine how personalized interpretation of heterogeneous pulmonary microenvironments may be used to improve pediatric HCT outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".