Magnitude estimation and site characterization in southwestern British Columbia: application to earthquake early warning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we took a close look at the Ocean Networks Canada’s earthquake early warning system in southwestern British Columbia through analysis of the magnitude estimates by this system and characterization of site conditions for both onshore and offshore stations. Using magnitude values estimated at each station, over hundreds of notifications, we provided station terms to correct the magnitudes for stations that systematically generate high or low magnitude values. Moreover, by compiling a rich ground motion amplitude dataset and applying the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method from Fourier amplitude of acceleration and response spectral acceleration, we investigated site characterization through evaluation of non-linear site response behavior and estimation of the site dominant frequency (fpeak) and its peak amplitude (Apeak) for each station. In general, no strong evidence of non-linearity is observed at any stations considering the magnitude-distance distribution of ground motions in this study. Offshore sites show fpeak and Apeak in the range of approximately 1.7–6 Hz and 0.4–1.2 (in base-10 log unit), respectively, whereas onshore sites show approximately 1–6 Hz for fpeak and 0.3–0.7 (in base-10 log unit) for Apeak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".