MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398278417 · doi:10.7910/dvn/oekb01

Data on first- and second-Order citations for sample of COVID-19 research

2023· dataset· en· W4398278417 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Pablo Alperín

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Sample (material)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakOrder (exchange)StatisticsMathematicsBiologyVirologyMedicineOutbreakEconomicsChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First- and second-order citations of a sample of COVID-19 research. First-order citation data includes news media mentions of research from Altmetric.com, Twitter mentions of research collected using the Twint Python library, and Facebook mention data collected through Crowdtangle. Second-order citation data (mentions of the news stories on social media) were collected using Twint (for Twitter mentions) and Crowdtangle (for Facebook mentions)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0170.024
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207