MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398397800 · doi:10.7910/dvn/cjymcv

Historical Snow Simulation (Open Loop)

2021· dataset· en· W4398397800 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie‐Amélie Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowLoop (graph theory)Open-loop controllerComputer scienceGeographyMeteorologyClosed loopMathematicsEngineeringControl engineeringCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains historical snow water equivalent (SWE) simulations, produced from the Hydrotel snow module fed with meteorological observations. The simulations are provided on a 10km by 10km grid covering the southern portion of the province of Quebec, Canada and used as a proxy of SWE climatology in our adaptation of the Schaake shuffle.. The grid for the historical SWE simulation covers -81.5 to -57.1 in longitude and 43 to 53.4 in latitude, which is smaller than the meteorological grids, but for the the common portion, the grids overlap. The SWE grid has is 105 (lat) x 245 (Lon), for a total of 25725 pixels. A total of 44 years are used to produce the historical grids (1961-2004), and +/- 7 days around each of the date is used, for a total of 44years x 15 days = 660 values for each day of the year. Therefore, the dimensions of the historical SWE data is 660 x 25 725, which represents "nb of sample days x grid points).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207