MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398470775 · doi:10.7910/dvn/kqe6kp

Foreign Policy Attitudes within the United Kingdom—Comparing Scotland to England, 2022

2024· dataset· en· W4398470775 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Scotto, Timothy B. Gravelle, Claire Duncanson

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomNew englandPolitical scienceLawGeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a dataset from a project aimed to study the foreign policy attitudes of Britons, with the specific aim of comparing attitudes in Scotland and England. Respondents were recruited using the Momentive/SurveyMokey endpage recruitment methodology between October 3 and October 22, 2022. As a key aim of the project was to compare Scottish and English respondents, oversampling Scottish respondents was necessary. To achieve this aim, two parallel online surveys were fielded: 1) in the entire United Kingdom; 2) in Scotland. The content of both surveys was the same. Number of Responses:: 6,579 Scotland+England, 4,479 England, 2,100 Scotland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.364

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207