A proposed hybrid model of ANN and KNN for solar cell defects detection and temperature prediction using fuzzy image segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel hybrid model employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Mathematical Morphology (MM) for the effective detection of defects in solar cells. Focusing on issues such as broken corners and black edges caused by environmental factors like broken glass cover, dust, and temperature variations. This study utilizes a hybrid model of ANN and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) for temperature prediction. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of both models, potentially opening up new avenues for improved accuracy in temperature forecasting, which is critical for solar energy applications. The significance lies in the interconnectedness of temperature fluctuations and solar cell efficiency, leading to defects. The proposed model aims to predict temperatures accurately, providing insights into potential solar cell efficiency problems. Subsequently, this work studies the transitions to defect detection using Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering and MM techniques. The hybrid model demonstrates accurate temperature prediction with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values of 0.92 %, 0.72 %, and 1.3 % for average, maximum, and minimum temperatures, respectively. The defect detection process yields a detection accuracy (CR) of 96 % and sensitivity of detection (SD) of 89 %. This work is validated compared to the literature work done and by using K-fold cross validation technique. The proposed work emphasizes the improvement in defect detection accuracy and the overall quality enhancement of solar cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".