MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398568142 · doi:10.7910/dvn/lhyqfm

Parliamentary Deployment Votes Database Version 3

2021· dataset· en· W4398568142 on OpenAlexaffabout
Falk Ostermann, Cornelia Baciu, Florian Böller, Dario Čepo, Flemming Juul Christiansen, Fabrizio Coticchia, Daan Fonck, Anna Herranz‐Surrallés, Juliet Kaarbo, Joo Hee Kim, Kryštof Kučmáš, Philippe Lagassé, Benjamin Martill, Kenneth McDonagh, Michal Onderčo, Rasmus Brun Pedersen, Tapio Raunio, Yf Reykers, Richard Sonneveld, Michal Smetana, Atsushi Tago, Özlem Terzi, Sigita Trainauskiene, Valerio Vignoli, Wolfgang Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Publications (Maastricht University) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatabaseSoftware deploymentComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Parliamentary Deployment Votes Database (PDVD) includes data on parliamentary votes on the deployment of armed forces. Version 3 of the dataset (V3, July 2021) contains data on 1,022 votes in plenaries and 5,540 party votes for the period between August 1990 and December 2019 in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The data consists of two separate datasets, one on parliamentary-level votes (PDVD_v3_votes) and one on party votes (PDVD_v3_party-votes) with accompanying documentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.068

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Publications (Maastricht University)Same topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207