MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398579925 · doi:10.7910/dvn/l5ng4q

Information asymmetry in the Kenyan medical laboratory sector

2021· dataset· en· W4398579925 on OpenAlexaff
Felix Bahati, Mike English, Shahin Sayed, Susan Horton, Onyango Abel Odhiambo, Abdulatif A Samatar, Jacob McKnight

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Coding and Health Information
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKenyaAsymmetryInformation asymmetryData scienceComputer scienceBusinessPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data were collected to determine whether patients had access to laboratory testing information including test test prices, turnaround time (TAT) and quality. We targeted patients seeking laboratory tests in two public hospitals in Nairobi. Some of the variables collected include the sociodemographic characteristics, test ordered by the clinician, availability of the test, test price and the TAT. The hospital-based survey was conducted between May and June 2019 using a semi-structured questionnaire developed in REDCap. In the second data set, we used a mystery caller approach to investigate test prices among clinical laboratories in Nairobi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.135

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicMedical Coding and Health InformationFrench-language works237,207