MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398618335 · doi:10.7910/dvn/lrp2mv/nldusi

3.trees-on-farms-diversity-sample-trees-land-use.tab

2018· dataset· en· W4398618335 on OpenAlexaff
Geovana Carreño-Rocabado, Willan Caicedo, Bryan Finegan, Miguel Cifuentes, Jenny Ordóñez

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSample (material)Diversity (politics)GeographyForestryAgroforestryEnvironmental scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tree sampling in five land use types (coffee and cocoa plantation, basic grains, pastureland, and home gardens) of 90 farms. In each plot between 1 to 5 transect of 100 x 20 m were sampling and trees bigger than 10 cm dbh were recorded (smaller for citrus). Each individual tree has the common and scientific names and dasometric variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.077

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207