MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4398639709 · doi:10.7910/dvn/ihwuyr

Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.21-Foreign Relations, 1751-1758. SC1/series 45X, Petition of William Bollan

2015· dataset· en· W4398639709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dataverse API Creator

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)HistoryGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petition subject: Slave trade Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906000 Date of creation: 17530000 Selected signatures: William Bollan Total signatures: 1 Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: agent for his Majesty's Province of Massachusetts Bay in New England Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Additional archivist notes: rum, sugar, molasses, Great Britain, British Northern Colonies, fisheries, fish, Indian and Guinea trade, British woolen [wool, cotton], manufacturers, European markets, French, English, King Charles, Newfoundland, France, fishermen, seamen, expedition, Cape Breton, shalloway, fishing vessel Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 21, pages 107-109 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2500.102

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard Dataverse→Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional History→French-language works237,207→