MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398677980 · doi:10.1215/01636545-11027326

Working Girl

2024· article· en· W4398677980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadical History Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlArtPolitical sciencePsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are many slang terms for full-service sex workers, but one of my favorites is working girl. I cannot be completely sure when I first heard it, but I knew it in passing before I began sex work in the early 2010s in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Once I was working, it likely popped up from one of the more experienced working girls in a dressing room. When I talk to civilians about the sex industry, I will usually say that I do “sex work” and discuss the figure of the “sex worker.” I am conscious of how the jaunty informality of working girl might not make it the most helpful term for conveying more serious messaging. It is anachronistic, almost deliberately so, and it both is and isn’t a euphemism. Instead, it feels more like shop talk. Sometimes I might shorten working girl to working. I will casually speak of “when I started working” or ask a friend “have you been working much recently?” when I am confident that all parties in the conversation know what kind of work I mean.Typically, when clients use this term, they refer to someone they knew personally who worked (“my ex-wife was a working girl,” “one of my cousins used to be a working girl back in the day”). Although it includes the diminutive girls, the force of this reference feels mitigated by the fact it is paired with an acknowledgement that our work is work. My fondness for the term is perhaps also unusual because although I have been a working girl for a decade, I am nonbinary and definitively not a girl myself.The term working girl appears in various oral histories and in academic research from New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. Becki L. Ross notes it was one of an interchangeable list of self-descriptors used in interviews with sex workers who worked in Vancouver’s West End through the 1970s and 1980s.1Working girl is also commonly used in news media coverage. Unlike other slang terms related to the sex industry appearing in the media—johns or tricks, for example—working girl is a term that actual working girls sometimes use.The working girl stands in contrast to what Juno Mac and Molly Smith have termed the “erotic professional.”2 They use this term to describe the sector of the industry who frame their work through lenses of sex positivity and empowerment. In this formulation the persona present in a sex worker’s marketing is offered to third parties as an authentic representation of their feelings about their work, foregrounding erotic desire and passion and foreclosing any meaningful discussion of material conditions. The erotic professional seeks to position their engagement with sex work as autonomous and professional, eliding the forms of social and economic privilege which enable this, most notably the economic security that enable sex workers to comfortably decline clients on the basis of sexual compatibility, not just safety. This framing often casts sex work as analogous to personal and private sexual relationships. The erotic professional tries to distance themselves from the history of the industry as well as the long-term project of sex worker activists to explain the industry as a type of work, not a type of sexual behavior. By contrast, the typical usage of working girl recalls continuities in the trade and is pragmatic, neutral, and businesslike.My experience as a sex worker and academic researcher has been shaped by working under Aotearoa’s model of decriminalization. The Prostitution Reform Act 2003 decriminalized indoor and street-based sex work for most people aged eighteen and over (although migrant sex workers are still excluded from its protections). Mac and Smith identify the erotic professional in discourses from locations where sex work is still criminalized, but this figure exists under decriminalization too. Elsewhere, I have argued that decriminalization has not resulted in a uniform rolling back of stigma but rather an unequal apportioning of it.3 The most acceptable sex workers are typically those who present a public face of authentic pleasure and empowerment. I like the term working girl because it feels rooted in a history of sex work that predates the erotic professional as well as the more recent conspicuous attempts to upscale and mainstream sex workplaces—which are especially marked following decriminalization.4 This mainstreaming recasts some workers as authentically engaged with their jobs, doing sex work as a profitable hobby or passion project, rather than performing labor to earn a living. The erotic professional is implicitly a classed position, and so too is the working girl—with working girls located squarely in the working class.The acceptable sex worker derives their status through a comparison to what they are not, the unacceptable other. I appreciate working girl for how it pushes back against this division, locating contemporary sex work within a much longer history. It takes one core tenet of the sex workers’ rights movement—that sex work is work—and incorporates it into the descriptor. Saying I am a working girl establishes the register in which I will discuss my work: pragmatic, not erotic. It is not making any particular claims about my feelings toward my job, but it notes pointedly that what I do with clients is work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it