MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398710523 · doi:10.7910/dvn/mq8ep0

Nursing Student Data

2020· dataset· en· W4398710523 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsRed River College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingPsychologyComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data include data for the nursing student participants and includes: Item data for the Situated Academic Writing Self-efficacy Scale all original items (SAWSES) Item data for the Self-Efficacy Scale for Academic Writing (SESAW) Item data for the Writing Apprehension Test (WAT) Item data for the Writing Self-Efficacy Instrument (WSEI Three context assessments: supportive environment, value of assignment, stakes of assignment Demographics: Writing Attitude, age categorical, ethnicity, English language status, writing in english status, year in nursing program, institution code 1 and 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.177

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207