MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398733205 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114341

Fault detection and diagnosis in light commercial buildings’ HVAC systems: A comprehensive framework, application, and performance evaluation

2024· article· en· W4398733205 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Milad Babadi Soultanzadeh, Mohamed Ouf, Mazdak Nik‐Bakht, Pierre Paquette, Steve Lupien

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsHVACFault detection and isolationAnomaly detectionComputer scienceScalabilityRaw dataFault (geology)Reliability engineeringFeature (linguistics)Data miningReal-time computingEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAir conditioningDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data-driven approach currently dominates the field of Automatic Fault Detection and Diagnosis (AFDD) in HVAC systems. However, a significant concern lies in the prevalent use of labeled experimental and simulation data, which often does not represent real-world operational conditions. This study unveils a comprehensive framework for AFDD in light commercial buildings, effectively leveraging unlabeled raw data extracted directly from their Building BAS. Its main goal is to provide a versatile methodology tailored for real-world applicability. Buildings classified as “light commercial” typically have less than 2,500 square meters of floor area and no more than six stories, such as small offices, medical facilities, banks, small manufacturing facilities, etc. A common feature of these buildings is the fact that the HVAC systems tend to be relatively simple and have similar configurations, thus making it easy to develop scalable and reproducible fault detection methods. The study focuses on a practical case study in a light commercial building HVAC system situated in Montreal, Canada, encompassing a single Air Handling Unit (AHU) and four Variable Air Volume (VAV) reheating boxes to evaluate the framework. This comprehensive framework encompasses a sequence of sub-objectives: creating a sizable, synchronized raw dataset from diverse BAS sensor tags, comprehensive data cleansing to address inconsistencies, developing an anomaly detection method, investigating these anomalies to extract underlying rules, and finally, dataset labeling. An AFDD classification model is then applied to evaluate its ability to distinguish normal from faulty conditions across various fault types. The study highlights the potential of dimensional reduction techniques and unsupervised clustering for effective anomaly detection in light commercial buildings, as well as the power of the Decision Tree classifier for uncovering hidden patterns, especially in anomaly conditions. It also highlights the significance of addressing imbalanced datasets in AFDD and the complexities of detecting sizing-related faults. Despite these challenges, the framework exhibits robust performance in detecting and diagnosing a range of HVAC faults. It offers a systematic and adaptable approach for handling real-world operational data in light commercial building HVAC systems, extendible to other building types, bridging the gap between data-driven methods and practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207