MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal modulation of the laser emission power for microstructural manipulation in powder bed fusion

2024· article· en· W4398749343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Processing Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistero dell'Istruzione e del MeritoEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of Nottingham
KeywordsFusionMaterials scienceLaserModulation (music)Power (physics)OptoelectronicsMetallurgyOpticsAcousticsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous Wave (CW) emission is typically employed in powder bed fusion by laser beam melting (PBF-LB/M) to additively manufacture components. Contemporary fiber laser sources also provide time-varying emission profiles which may be exploited to modify the microstructural characteristics of the depositions. In order to explore the wide range of possibilities enabled by temporal waveform modulation of the power, in the present research experimental data was coupled to a digital model of the PBF-LB/M process to develop a methodological framework to investigate the solidification mechanisms induced by different emission profiles. Detailed metallurgical analysis was conducted on single track deposition obtained with different emission modes corresponding to CW, Square Wave (SQW) and a Ramp Up (RUP) temporal profiles. The process was observed in-situ by means of high speed imaging to characterise the melt pool geometry whilst the microstructure was examined along both the longitudinal and transverse direction of the depositions, exposing grain texture and morphology. Microstructure could be tailored employing different emission profiles whereby band-like columnar grain growth at a 30° inclination with respect to the build direction was obtained with RUP with a strong (100) texture whereas CW emission promoted equiaxed fine grains. SQW emission showed a compromise between columnar and equiaxed grain growth avoiding significant pore formation which was on the other hand present in the case of RUP emission. A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model was validated by comparing the predicted melt region with the metallographic cross-sections, thus supporting the creation of a digital platform to explore emission profiles in the future. Moreover, the numerical model allowed the observation of the sub-surface melt pool geometry disclosing the dynamics of pore formation which could be associated to keyhole collapse due to abrupt power variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it