Perlindungan Hukum oleh Negara Indonesia Terhadap Lingkungan dan Kesetaraan Gender
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research is prepared with the aim of assisting the national interests of Indonesia by examining legal protection for the environment and gender equality in the context of the expansion of the economy resulting from the implementation of a free-trade agreement. Considering the situation in the ICA-CEPA negotiations, where Canada demands that Indonesia commit to legal protection for the environment and gender equality in the context of the FTA before the agreement can be ratified, and considering that there is no juridical research examining Indonesia's commitments in these relevant issues, it becomes urgent to conduct this research to support the country in obtaining its national interests in ICA-CEPA. This research uses the juridical-normative research method with a statute approach and employs the legal material collection method of literature study as well as the qualitative analysis method. The research findings show that Indonesia has legal protection for the environment in the context of the FTA through the ISPO mechanism and provisions in the IE-CEPA. Regarding gender equality, Indonesia has legal protection through its membership in CEDAW and various applicable national legal instruments, as well as through cooperation with EFTA in women's entrepreneurship. The lack of knowledge (research gap) regarding the law creates an urgency for this research to fill that gap and help Indonesia. Here lies the novelty of the research, namely in complementing previous research to answer unanswered questions. Penelitian ini disusun dengan tujuan untuk membantu kepentingan nasional Indonesia dengan mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap Lingkungan dan Kesetaraan Gender dalam konteks perluasan ekomomi hasil dari berlakunya suatu Free-Trade Agreement. Mengingat bahwa situasi dalam negosiasi ICA-CEPA, dimana Kanada menuntut Indonesia untuk memiliki komitmen hukum terlebih dahulu terhadap perlindungan lingkungan dan kesetaraan gender dalam konteks FTA agar perjanjian dapat disahkan, dan menimbang bahwa belum ada Penelitian Yuridis yang mengkaji komitmen Indonesia dalam isu yang relevan tersebut, maka hal ini menjadi urgensi dalam penyusunan penelitian ini agar dapat mendukung Negara memperoleh Kepentingan Nasional-nya dalam ICA-CEPA. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Penelitian Yuridis-Normatif dengan Pendekatan Statute Approach dan menggunakan Metode Pengumpulan Materi Hukum Studi Pustaka serta Metode Analisis Kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki perlindungan hukum untuk lingkungan dalam konteks FTA melalui mekanisme ISPO dan ketentuan dalam IE-CEPA. Mengenai kesetaraan gender, Indonesia memiliki perlindungan hukum melalui keanggotaannya dalam CEDAW dan dengan berbagai instrumen hukum nasional yang berlaku, serta melalui kerja sama dengan EFTA dalam kewirausahaan perempuan. Adanya kekosongan ilmu pengetahuan (research gap) tentang hukum,menimbulkan urgensi bagi penelitian ini untuk mengisi kekosongan tersebut, guna membantu Indonesia. Disinilah letak kebaruan penelitian, yaitu dalam melengkapi penelitian sebelumnya untuk menjawab pertanyaan yang belum terjawab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it