Linking weather and health outcomes: Examining the potential influences of weather factors and particulate matter pollution on adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Kavre district, Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) include stillbirth, preterm birth, and low birthweight (LBW). Studies exploring the impact of weather factors and air pollution on APOs are scarce in Nepal. We examined the impacts of prenatal exposure to temperature, precipitation, and air pollution (PM2.5) on APOs among women living in Kavre, Nepal. We conducted a hospital and rural health centres-based historical cohort study that included health facility birth records (n=1716) from the Nepali fiscal year 2017/18 through 2019/20. We linked health records to temperature, precipitation, and PM2.5 data for Kavre for the six months preceding each birth. A random intercept model was used to analyze birthweight, while a composite APO variable, was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression in relation to environmental exposures. The proportion of LBW (<2500 gm), preterm birth (babies born alive before 37 weeks of gestation), and stillbirth was 13%, 4.3%, and 1.5%, respectively, in this study. Overall, around 16% of the study participants had one or more APOs. Total precipitation (β: 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.33, p = 0.03) had a positive effect on birthweight in the wetter season. Negative effects for mean maximum (β: -33.37, 95% CI -56.68 to -10.06, p = 0.005), mean (β: -32.35, 95% CI -54.44 to -10.27, p = 0.004), and mean minimum temperature (β: -29.28, 95% CI -49.58 to -8.98, p = 0.005) on birthweight was also observed in the wetter season. A positive effect of temperature (mean maximum, mean, and mean minimum) and total precipitation on birthweight was found in the wetter season. This study emphasizes the need for future research using larger cohorts to elucidate these complex relationships in Nepal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".