Bibliographic record
Abstract
from the inception of the University in 1877 until his death, the Archbishop functioned with conspicuous distinction.In a real sense, his task was harder than anybody else's, because I must remind you that in those days the office of President of the University had not yet been created, and therefore the Chancellor had to function not only in that capacity, but also as a kind of quasi-President as well.In a real sense, Archbishop Robert Machray was one of the architects of this university, because without his active support, the untried experiment which grew into this institution which we call the University of Manitoba today could never have been launched.From 1877 then, until 1904, the years of infancy, the years of early growth and development, Archbishop Robert Machray served this institution and left it an established University.To one who would like to think that the office of Chancellor is crucial and decisive in the structure of a university, it comes as a somewhat sobering and disquieting thought to learn that for four years after Archbishop Machray's death the university functioned without a chancellor and, quite evidently, survived.In 1908, the second Chancellor, Archbishop S
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".