Correction to: Integrated Safety Analysis of Ritlecitinib, an Oral JAK3/TEC Family Kinase Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata from the ALLEGRO Clinical Trial Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A video abstract is now available for this publication, which can be viewed online. The video abstract can also be accessed on the article’s Figshare page here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24749436 and in the parent article as Supplementary file 3. 2xeqpp-jg_FT7HrQkW1y9mVideo abstract: Integrated safety analysis of ritlecitinib in patients aged ≥ 12 years with alopecia areata (MP4 1.03 gb)Video abstract: Integrated safety analysis of ritlecitinib in patients aged ≥ 12 years with alopecia areata (MP4 1.03 gb) Video abstract: Integrated safety analysis of ritlecitinib in patients aged ≥ 12 years with alopecia areata (MP4 1.03 gb). In Supplementary file2, Table S11, “Lymphocytes, n/N1 (%)c, Grade 3 (200 to < 500/mm3)” row, “Any ritlecitinib (n=1294)” column, the data that previously read: “27/128 (2.1)” should have read: “27/1286 (2.1)” The original Supplementary file 2 has been corrected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.081 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.234 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".