Perencanaan Sistem Distribusi Air Baku Pada Desa Kelubaq Kecamatan Tering Kabupaten Kutai Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desa Kelubaq terletak di wilayah administrasi Kecamatan Tering Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Dalam memenuhi kebutuhan air nya, masyarakat sekitar masih bergantung dari Sungai Mahakam sebagai pemasok utama dan juga air tanah dari sumur galian, namun masih belum terdapat jaringan distribusi air baku pada daerah tersebut. Dengan demikian, perlu dilakukan perencanaan sistem distribusi air baku untuk dapat memudahkan masyarakat dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan air baku setiap harinya. Dalam perencanaan sistem jaringan air baku, dilakukan dengan software WaterCad V8i untuk mempermudah dalam proses analisa hidrolika di dalam pipa, sedangkan untuk perhitungan anggaran biaya dan analisa ekonomi dilakukan secara manual. Kriteria analisa hidrolis mengacu kepada Permen PUPR No. 18/PRT/M/2007, sedangkan untuk perhitungan anggaran biaya mengacu dari Permen PUPR No. 28/PRT/M/2016. Hasil rancangan ini menyatakan besaran kecepatan dengan nilai 0,10 – 1,05 m/dt, headloss gardient sebesar 0,02 – 12,92 m/km, dan tekanan sebesar 3,5 – 9,8 atm. Total anggaran biaya yang harus dikeluarkan Rp. 258,952,000.00 dengan penetapan harga air sebesar Rp. 2,499.89/m3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".